- Straight leg.
- Classic Fit: Sits at waist.
- Trim through hip and thigh.
Men's BeanFlex® Canvas Pants, Utility, Classic Fit, Straight Leg
N/A
{"sales":{"value":null,"currency":null,"formatted":"N/A"},"list":null}
FREE Shipping with C$ 75 Purchase
Waist:
Please select waist
Inseam:
Please select inseam
Limited quantity
More information is needed.
Please select:
In-store Availability: Select options (ex.: size or color)
Product Details
These rugged, workwear-inspired canvas pants handle everything from yard work to hanging out by the fire pit. Comfortable, durable and designed with a little extra room to let you move around more easily.
Discover the broken-in comfort of our BeanBuilt collection. These rugged styles don't mind a little mud, rain or dirt--instead, they get even better with age. Whether you're hauling brush or grabbing breakfast, they're made for real life in every way.
- Midweight 7.5 oz. canvas.
- 98% cotton, 2% spandex.
- Machine wash and dry.
- Brushed for instant softness.
- Built-in stretch for ease of movement.
- Made of durable, abrasion-resistant canvas.
- Innovative fabric wicks moisture away for all-day comfort.
- Wider hem resists scuffing.
- Finished with contrast-stitch details.
- Two back pockets.
- Side cargo utility pockets and hammer loop.
- Gusseted crotch lets you move more easily.
Rated 1 out of
5
by
Duhave from
Great idea of a great pant
Wrinkles to the max. Also sewn to be in prone position.
Date published: 2024-03-15
Rated 5 out of
5
by
Andrew from
Great working pants.
Was looking for good work pants for around the house doing odd jobs. These fit good, are very comfortable and true to size.
Date published: 2023-12-30
Rated 1 out of
5
by
DontSellMeGarbageAgain from
Not worth the price
Many problems here (I own two pair):
1.) Shallow pockets. Your stuff will fall out on the floor constantly.
2.) I bought two pairs. The fit was entirely different on each. The first fit well the second not at all. Both ordered were the same size according to the site and labels sewn in.
3.) The fly does not stay zipped on either pair. Potentially very embarrassing pants here.
4.) After a few moths of light use, the fly button just popped off the evening I am writing this review. The fabric gave up and this pair is a total loss.
These are a total loss and should not be considered for actual work. Really sad to see this company peddling garbage. Selling this garbage is a scam and LL Bean should know it.
Date published: 2023-12-13
Rated 4 out of
5
by
Ann PS from
Great style & comfort
Comfortable, sturdy & yet nice enough to wear to work as a floor supervisor
Date published: 2023-10-03
Rated 5 out of
5
by
David Lind from
Bought a 2nd pair!
So comfortable. I’ve been looking for pants like this for a while. They fit great and feel tough enough to last for years.
Date published: 2023-06-22
Rated 5 out of
5
by
SmallTetons from
Comfort in Canvas!
The nicest pair of pants I've owned in 39 years. Coming from a 62 year old dude, that says a lot.
Date published: 2023-03-15
Rated 2 out of
5
by
MN2ME from
Uncomfortable and dubious quality
I felt odd the minute I put on these pants. They are rated a classic fit, meaning they are supposed to sit at the waist, but the pants have a very short rise, which made them quite uncomfortable. Also, the material is very thin. They looked and felt cheap, certainly not worth $89! I returned them. Years ago, I had several pairs of Bean's Allagash cargo pants which I felt where better-made and more comfortable. Alas, those have been discontinued!
Date published: 2023-03-07
Rated 2 out of
5
by
Rob D from
Too tight, too slim,
A disp-ointment compared to the twill stretch cotton work pants I bought from Bean for years but were discontinued. These are a lighter-weight fabric, the short rise is too tight in the crotch for actual work without binding/pinching, the legs are slim and tight, the front pockets are smaller so I can barely fit the smallest IPhone in , the rear pockets just barely fit my small wallet. It seems like these are all about eliminating fabric here, there and everywhere possible to cut manufacturing cost. A disappointment, so I’m returning 2 of 3 pair that I purchased.
Date published: 2023-03-01